AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CALIFORNIA CANNING PEACH GROWERS v. MYERS et al.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a bill in equity praying for an injunction to enjoin defendants from conducting a hearing under the Agricultural Adjustment Code on an order to show cause why the license issued by the Secretary of Agriculture to the plaintiff should not be revoked. A motion to dismiss the bill was granted, from which the plaintiff appeals.

Since the prosecution of this appeal, the hearing sought to be enjoined has concluded. The appellees moved to dismiss the appeal because the cause is moot.

The questions arising upon this appeal have become moot. Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U.S. 487, 31 S. Ct. 43, 54 L. Ed. 1121; Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651, 16 S. Ct. 132, 40 L. Ed. 293; Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147, 24 S. Ct. 611, 48 L. Ed. 913; Selden v. Montague, 194 U.S. 153, 24 S. Ct. 613, 48 L. Ed. 915; Wingert v. First National Bank, 223 U.S. 670, 32 S. Ct. 391, 56 L. Ed. 605.

The appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CALIFORNIA CANNING PEACH GROWERS v. MYERS
(Jun 3, 1935)