Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRED D. BROWN a. v. LENA MAE BROCKWAY, Ex'x.

No action can be brought upon a sheriff's bond until a judgment has first been obtained against him or his deputy for breach of duty. (P. L., c. 37, s. 10). An action for such breach having been brought against the administrator of a deceased deputy, whose estate had been administered in the insolvent course, the court may grant leave to prosecute such action (P. L., c. 302, s. 8) where the plaintiff disclaims any right to satisfy a judgment out of the decedent's estate. In such case the obligors of the bond are entitled to notice and opportunity to appear and defend before leave to prosecute further is given. A declaration on the common counts may be amended by adding a count for negligence, though more than six years had elapsed since the cause of action accrued, where justice so requires. (P. L., c. 334, s. 9).

PER CURIAM.

The statute (P. L., c. 302, s. 8) requires the leave of court to further prosecute an action pending against a defendant who has died and whose estate is administered in the insolvent course. The plaintiff disclaims any right to satisfy from the decedent's estate any judgment he may obtain, and he depends wholly upon the sheriff's bond for satisfaction. He cannot bring suit upon the bond except upon a judgment as the cause of action. P. L., c. 37, s. 10. In this situation, as matter of law, the plaintiff is entitled as against the defendant to receive leave to proceed with his action. It is too late to make the sheriff a party to the action, but the bond is security for the wrongs of his deputies as well as for his own. Since recovery upon the bond is ultimately sought, the obligors thereon are entitled to notice and an opportunity to appear and defend the action before leave to prosecute it further is granted.

The statute of limitations did not bar the amendment. Amendments of substance may be permitted "in any stage of the proceedings." P. L., c. 334, s. 9. They have retroactive effect so far as justice requires. The action was brought within the prescribed time, and when brought it became amendable at any time during its pendency.

Exceptions overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROWN v. BROCKWAY
(Jun 4, 1935)