Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. E.D. WILSON, Appellant.

BARNARD, P.J.

The defendant, after conviction on a charge of driving a vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, has attempted to appeal and the respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal.

[1] When the verdict was entered counsel for appellant stated that he was giving oral notice of appeal. This notice was premature and without effect. ( People v. Ward, 138 Cal. 684 [ 72 P. 343]; People v. Hill, 1 Cal.App. 414 [ 82 P. 398].) [2] Thereafter judgment was entered, no notice of appeal being then given. Five days later, a written notice of appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial was filed. This notice was too late and was ineffectual for any purpose. (Sec. 1239, Pen. Code; People v. Lewis, 219 Cal. 410 [ 27 P.2d 73]; People v. Sullivan, 123 Cal.App. 436 [ 11 P.2d 420]; People v. Payne, 106 Cal.App. 609 [ 289 P. 909].)

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Harden, J., pro tem., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WILSON
(Jun 12, 1935)