AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

NU ENAMEL CORPORATION et al., Respondents, v. NATE ENAMEL CO., INC., et al., Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Judgment, by consent in open court, has been amended by striking out the provisions for an accounting. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NU ENAMEL CORPORATION v. NATE ENAMEL CO
(Jul 11, 1935)