Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Application of THOMAS J. DORSEY, Petitioner, for a Peremptory Order of Mandamus against S. HOWARD COHEN and Others, as and Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents. Affd., 245 A.D. 849; 268 N.Y. 620.

ROSENMAN, J.

The provisions of section 135 of the Election Law, added by chapter 955 of the Laws of 1935, requiring a statement showing when and where the subscribing witness was last registered, is a substantial amendment. Its efficacy to prevent fraud is not a matter for the court's consideration. It must be complied with, along with other formal requirements of law. Non-compliance therewith justifies the action which the board of elections has taken. Motion denied. Settle order on one day's notice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DORSEY v. COHEN
(Aug 29, 1935)