Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHARLES F. KRAEMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPALCORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, except that we find it unnecessary to determine whether the appellant was an officer of the city of Newark and therefore make no suggestion as to the fact thereon. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KRAEMER v. NEWARK
(Oct 9, 1935)