Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SUTPHIN ET AL. v. THE STATE, EX REL. JEBY ET AL.

Mandamus — Writ denied to control discretion — Boxing commission exercised discretion authorized by rules and contract.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed; and this court proceeding to render the judgment that the Court of Appeals should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

This court finds from the record that the Boxing and Wrestling Commission was authorized to adopt rules; that that commission adopted such rules; that the defendants in error entered into an agreement making such rules govern the contest, and that the rules lodged discretion in such commission, which discretion was exercised in accordance therewith.

Mandamus will lie to compel, but not to control, the exercise of discretion. State, ex rel. Armstrong, v. Davey, Governor, ante, 160.

Judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed, and that of Common Pleas affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUTPHIN v. STATE, EX REL
(Nov 6, 1935)