Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

RUSSELL v. STATE.

PER CURIAM.

To the Court of Appeals of Alabama:

Answering your question above certified, we are of opinion the verdict set out therein is valid and sufficient.

An indictment for assault with intent to murder includes the lesser offense of assault and battery. Jones v. State, 79 Ala. 23.

The verdict will be referred to the indictment, without adding "as charged in the indictment," or other like recital. Blount et al. v. State, 49 Ala. 381; McDonald v. State, 118 Ala. 672, 23 So. 637; Gulledge v. State, 230 Ala. 206, 160 So. 556.

Such verdict responds to all the issues presented, operating an acquittal of the higher and a conviction of the lower offense charged in the indictment. Identifying the lower offense by the usual designation "assault and battery" and affixing a punishment suited to such offense is sufficient.

This is a general and not a special verdict within the rules requiring special verdicts to set out the findings of fact, etc. 16 C.J. p. 1110; Id., p. 1099; 64 C.J. pp. 1053-54; Id., p. 1065.

All the Justices concur, except ANDERSON, C. J., not sitting.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUSSELL v. STATE
(Dec 14, 1935)