Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE GEORGE D. HARTER BANK OF CANTON, TRUSTEE, ET AL. v. MUSKINGUM WATERSHED CONSERVANCY DIST.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Appropriation of private property incidental to improvement — Section 6828 et seq., General Code — Jurisdiction of Common Pleas Court — Right of conservancy district to amend plan during trial.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS and DAY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK v. CONSERVANCY DIST
(Dec 18, 1935)