Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Stopyra, Appellant, v. Ward Baking Company.

PER CURIAM, January 6, 1936:

At the trial of this action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile collision, the jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed from the refusal of the court below to award a new trial. After a full examination of the record, including the notes of testimony and the charge of the court, we find no reason for disturbing the verdict. Moreover, we are convinced the decision reached by the jury was clearly warranted under the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STOPYRA v. WARD BAKING COMPANY
(Jan 6, 1936)