AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

MICHAEL WEISKOPF, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS et al., Appellants.

Judgments reversed and motion denied, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. This is not a case to be decided on the pleadings. The constitutionality of the regulations must be decided after the facts are determined on the trial. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ. LEHMAN and CROUCH, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEISKOPF v. CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
(Jan 7, 1936)