Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CRETCHEN v. WINONA RAILROAD COMPANY.

1. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS — Pleading — Demurrer. — Complaint for personal injuries, showing on its face that it was filed more than two years after the action accrued, held demurrable. p. 415.

2. APPEALS — Briefs — Points and Authorities — Omission Waives Errors. — Where appellant's brief failed to set out any propositions, points, and authorities as provided by court rules, all errors are waived. p. 415.

HUGHES, J.

This was an action by appellant against the appellee to recover damages for personal injuries received while a passenger on one of the trains of appellee. A demurrer was sustained to the amended complaint of appellant, and, refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee.

The complaint on its face shows that the cause of action was for injuries to the person and that it occurred more than two years before the beginning of the action. It is alleged 1. that the injury to the appellant was received on October 24, 1927, and the complaint was filed on December 17, 1931. Therefore the statute of limitations had run on the cause of action. § 302, Burns 1926, § 2-602, Burns 1933, § 61, Baldwin's 1934. The demurrer was properly sustained.

Even though the demurrer was improperly sustained, the appellant could not prevail in this appeal. He has made no effort to comply with the rules of this court in preparing his 2. brief. He did not set out any propositions, points, and authorities as provided for under rule 21. Apparently no good faith effort was made to comply with said rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRETCHEN v. WINONA RAILROAD CO
(Jan 14, 1936)