(Syllabus.)
Eminent Domain — Pipe Line Along and Under Highway Held not Additional Servitude Entitling Owner of Abutting Land to Compensation Therefor.
The construction and maintenance of an oil pipe line along and under a state highway, constructed and maintained in the manner authorized and provided by law, is not an additional servitude for which compensation must be paid to the owner of abutting land, or to the owner of the land over which the highway was laid.
WELCH, J.
This case was tried with, and the same record made as in, F.D. Nazworthy v. Illinois Oil Company, 176 Okla. 37, 54 P.2d 642, this day decided. The same questions are involved. What was said in that case is applicable here. The same judgment was rendered below. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents. BUSBY and PHELPS, JJ., absent.