Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALICE M. NORTON vs. MAURICE A. NORTON.

Probate Court, Appeal, Findings by judge.

Upon an appeal from a decree of a probate court with a report of material facts but without a report of the evidence, the only question before this court is whether the decree was within the scope of the pleadings and was warranted by the facts found.

BY THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the libellee from a decree granting a divorce on the ground of cruel and abusive treatment, awarding custody of their minor children to the libellant and ordering payments to be made to her for the support of the children by the libellee. The trial judge made a report of the material facts found by him. The evidence is not reported. Therefore it must be presumed that the findings of fact were supported by evidence. The only question open on such an appeal is whether the decree is within the scope of the libel and is supported by the facts found. These facts need not be repeated or summarized. They did not establish or require a finding of condonation. Giles v. Giles, 279 Mass. 469. Plainly they supported the decree. Jordan v. Ulmer, 237 Mass. 577. Wyness v. Crowley, 292 Mass. 459.

Decree affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NORTON v. NORTON
(Apr 1, 1936)