Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHERMAN BEDDINGFIELD v. THE STATE.

Affidavit — Statement of Facts.

Defendant's affidavit in record on appeal, to the effect that he was unable to pay for statement of facts, or give security therefor held not to warrant reversal of conviction on the ground that defendant had been deprived of statement of facts, where there was nothing in record to show that affidavit was called to the attention of trial judge.

CHRISTIAN, JUDGE. —

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

We find in the record an affidavit on the part of appellant to the effect that he was unable to pay for a statement of facts or give security therefor. There is nothing in the record to show that said affidavit was called to the attention of the trial judge. It follows that a reversal of the judgment on the ground that appellant has been deprived of a statement of facts would not be warranted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BEDDINGFIELD v. STATE
(Apr 22, 1936)