BRITTINGHAM v. HUYLER'S, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Charles Jones
Harrison Roche, for the
Lum, Tamblyn Fairlie, for the

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Charles Jones
Harrison Roche, for the
Lum, Tamblyn Fairlie, for the

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MAY M. BRITTINGHAM et al., respondents, v. HUYLER'S, a New Yorkcorporation, et al., appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 118 N.J. Eq. 352. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — DONGES, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BRITTINGHAM v. HUYLER'S

MAY M. BRITTINGHAM et al., respondents, v. HUYLER'S, a New Yorkcorporation, et al., appellants.

Comments