Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BURON FITTS, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,Respondent.

THE COURT.

This proceeding is simply a duplication of proceeding, L.A. No. 15256 ( ante, p. 230 [ 57 P.2d 510]), this day decided. It was filed subsequently to the commencement of proceeding, L.A. No. 15256. The only difference in the institution of the two proceedings is that the petition in proceeding, L.A. No. 15256, was filed in the District Court of Appeal in and for the Second District and thereafter transferred to this court. The petition in the instant proceeding was commenced by the filing of the petition in this court but five days after the commencement of proceeding L.A. No. 15256 in said District Court of Appeal, and while said last-named proceeding was pending in said District Court of Appeal. [1] As the District Court of Appeal had jurisdiction over the subject matter involved in the instant proceeding, at the date of its commencement, this court was without jurisdiction to entertain the same. It is therefore dismissed upon the ground just stated. The alternative writ is hereby discharged.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FITTS v. SUPERIOR COURT
(Apr 30, 1936)