Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

EDWARD ANTENEN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant.

Judgments reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts. (See Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 262 N.Y. 107.) No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANTENEN v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY
(May 1, 1936)