Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • For the appellant borough of Allenhurst, Richard W.
  • For the appellant borough of Interlaken, Isaiah Matlack ( Frank A. Boettner, Jules E. Tepper
  • William J. O'Hagan, of counsel). For the respondent city of Long Branch, Jacob Steinbach, Jr. For the respondent borough of Deal, T. Cyril
  • For the respondent township of Dover, Ocean county, David A.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • For the appellant borough of Allenhurst, Richard W.
  • For the appellant borough of Interlaken, Isaiah Matlack ( Frank A. Boettner, Jules E. Tepper
  • William J. O'Hagan, of counsel). For the respondent city of Long Branch, Jacob Steinbach, Jr. For the respondent borough of Deal, T. Cyril
  • For the respondent township of Dover, Ocean county, David A.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

CITY OF LONG BRANCH, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ETAL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS; BOROUGH OF ALLENHURST AND INTERLAKEN,APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review, in this case, is reversed, for the reasons stated in Town of West Orange et al. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 115 N.J.L. 396 ; 180 Atl. Rep. 770, and affirmed by this court in 116 N.J.L. 414.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, LLOYD, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

LONG BRANCH v. STATE BOARD TAX APPEALS
(May 14, 1936)