Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Breed, Abbott Morgan, of New York City, for appellants Henry Schneiwind, Jr., and Irving Trust Co., as trustees of Susquehanna Silk Mills, debtor. Shearman Sterling, of New York City, for appellant Debenture Holders' Protective Committee. Hughes, Schurman Dwight, of New York City, for appellants L.F. Dommerich Co. and E. Gerli Co., Inc. Putney, Twombly Hall, of New York City, for appellants Mitsui Co., Ltd., and Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd. Charles H. Tuttle, Sanford H.E. Freund, Frank C. Fisher, and Lemuel Skidmore, all of New York City, of counsel. Abram Salsburg, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellees.
Judges
  • Joseph Buffington
  • John Warren Davis
  • Joseph Whitaker Thompson
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Breed, Abbott Morgan, of New York City, for appellants Henry Schneiwind, Jr., and Irving Trust Co., as trustees of Susquehanna Silk Mills, debtor. Shearman Sterling, of New York City, for appellant Debenture Holders' Protective Committee. Hughes, Schurman Dwight, of New York City, for appellants L.F. Dommerich Co. and E. Gerli Co., Inc. Putney, Twombly Hall, of New York City, for appellants Mitsui Co., Ltd., and Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd. Charles H. Tuttle, Sanford H.E. Freund, Frank C. Fisher, and Lemuel Skidmore, all of New York City, of counsel. Abram Salsburg, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellees.
Judges
  • Joseph Buffington
  • John Warren Davis
  • Joseph Whitaker Thompson
See more information ...
Smart Summary

Henry SCHNEIWIND, Jr., and Ir v. ng Trust Company as Trustee of Susquehanna Silk Mills, Debtor, Debenture Bondholders Committee; L.F. Dommerich Company; E. Gerli Company, Inc.; Mitsui Company, Ltd., and Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd., Appellants,

PER CURIAM.

After argument and full consideration had, it is ordered that the decree below appealed from be vacated, and it is further ordered that each of the ancillary receivers, in addition to the $3,500 heretofore allowed them, be awarded the sum of $1,500, which additional sum of $1,500 will make the total allowance to each of the said ancillary receivers $5,000 in all.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SCHNEIWIND v. FOCHT
(May 6, 1936)