AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ANDREW GROFF, Appellant, v. THE DAILY REVIEW CORPORATION, Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)

Order denying, in an action for libel, plaintiff's motion for an examination of the defendant with respect to matters alleged in the complaint and denied by the defendant, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The nature of the action does not justify denial of the motion. The subject-matter of the examination is proper in view of defendant's denials. The introduction of each item with the word "Whether" is not objectionable. Although some of the items are not in good form, this court will not correct the form or substance of questions that were not made the subject of objection. The examination is to proceed on five days' notice at a time and place to be fixed in the order. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GROFF v. DAILY REVIEW CORPORATION
(Jun 1, 1936)