Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BEATRICE LIEBERMAN vs. DANIEL LIEBERMAN

Petition for divorce. Evidence reviewed and although it is a question whose fault it was which destroyed the objects of the marital relation, yet since the defendant offered no evidence, the plaintiff's version is accepted and a decree granted.

CORNELL, J.

The claim for alimony in the above entitled cause is withdrawn.

From the evidence offered, it appears certain that the objects of the marital relation between the parties here are destroyed beyond hope of rehabilitation.

Observation of the plaintiff on the stand left doubt in the mind of the court, however, whether all this was wholly the fault of the defendant or that of the plaintiff — if not, in fact, that of both.

However, no defense has been interposed so that the court is required to accept plaintiff's version of the events which accounts for the debacle, especially as defendant while represented at the trial by counsel, made no effort to destroy or modify its purport.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LIEBERMAN v. LIEBERMAN
(Sep 9, 1936)