Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SCHMIDT, APPELLANT v. THE PURE PROTECTION LIFE ASSN., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Petition to vacate judgment filed in Court of Appeals — Upon ground newly discovered decision by another Court of Appeals created conflict — Due process and equal protection — Jury trial granted in one case and denied in another — Directed verdict for insurer on lapsed life insurance policy — Beneficiary claimed insurer customarily accepted overdue premiums and continued policy in force.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

WILLIAMS and JONES, JJ., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHMIDT v. P. P. LIFE ASSN
(Oct 28, 1936)