Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LOUISE E. HENZI, Appellant, v. NESSIM D. BENEZRA, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff was operated on by defendant. She was wholly or partly under anesthesia for several hours during which time her adenoids were removed. After the operation she was returned to her bed in the hospital. Twenty-four hours later she noticed a tooth was injured. There is expert opinion evidence that the injury was of traumatic origin. Plaintiff claims that the rule of res ipsa loquitur applies and that she established a prima facie case of negligence on the part of defendant, the operating physician.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is based on the consideration that control of the thing that produced the injury is exclusively with defendant. ( Stater v. Barnes, 241 N.Y. 284. )

During a large part of the period between the administration of the ether and the discovery of the injury, plaintiff was not under defendant's care but that of the hospital. Under such circumstances plaintiff failed to establish defendant's liability.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur. Present — LYDON, LEVY and CALLAHAN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HENZI v. BENEZRA
(Nov 16, 1936)