Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY SAGNELLA vs. CENTRAL MANUFACTURERS' MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

To the action of the plaintiff seeking to recover upon a policy of insurance the defendant affirmatively pleads in answer that the plaintiff did not fulfill her obligations under the contract and sets forth the particular parts of such contract violated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks by his motion a more specific statement of the answer. Held: The motion of the plaintiff asks that the defendant disclose the evidence which it will offer in proof of its defense and as these facts are not peculiarly in the possession of the defendant, the motion is denied.

FOSTER, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover upon a policy of insurance for loss by fire. The policy of insurance is a contract upon which the plaintiff relies for recovery. The burden is upon the plaintiff to prove that she has fulfilled her obligations under such contract. The defendant affirmatively pleads in answer that the plaintiff did not fulfill her obligations under the contract and sets forth in various defenses the particular parts of such contract violated by the plaintiff. If the terms of the contract were violated by the plaintiff she has full knowledge of such facts or should have such knowledge. The defendant in its answer affirmatively alleges the specific violations of the contract by the plaintiff upon which it relies in defense and thereby puts the plaintiff on notice of the facts which it proposes to prove in defense of the action. The motion of the plaintiff in reality asks that the defendant be required to disclose the evidence which it will offer in proof of the facts alleged by it in defense. The facts in evidence demanded are not peculiarly in the knowledge or possession of the defendant. The plaintiff either knows the truth or falsity of the facts and evidence demanded or has equal opportunity with the defendant in ascertaining the same. Moreover if the defendant were required to furnish the information demanded in the motion it might be unduly and unfairly limited in its proof upon trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAGNELLA v. CENT. MANUFACTURERS' MUT. INS
(Nov 17, 1936)