Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Guardian and ward — Section 11214, General Code — Legalization of unauthorized investments by subsequent approval of Probate Court — Retroactive laws and laws impairing obligations of contracts — Article II, Section 28, Constitution — Section 10506-41, General Code — Retroactive effect upon legal investments where contract rights exist.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.