Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Tenaglia v. Tenaglia, Appellant.

Argued November 17, 1936.

PER CURIAM, December 10, 1936:

Upon a review of the evidence in this case we are in general accord with the conclusions of the Master and the Court below. Since the argument the appellant has died. We shall decide the case — see Upperman v. Upperman, 119 Pa. Super. 341 — but no good purpose would be served by a review of the evidence.

The decree is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TENAGLIA v. TENAGLIA
(Dec 10, 1936)