Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Siemientkoskie v. Graboskie et ux., Appellants.

Appeals — Review — Findings — Conveyance — Purchase price paid by third person.

On appeal from a decree directing a conveyance of real estate to plaintiff, the person who paid the purchase price, the deed having been made to defendants, the evidence was held sufficient to sustain a finding that at the time the consideration was paid and the property conveyed to defendants, the plaintiff did not comprehend the nature of his act nor understand the transaction, and the decree was affirmed.

Argued December 1, 1936.

PER CURIAM, December 16, 1936:

This is an appeal from a decree directing a conveyance of real estate to appellee, the person who had paid the purchase price, the deed having been made to appellants. The court below found as a fact that at the time the consideration was paid and the property conveyed to appellants, the appellee "did not comprehend the nature of his act nor did he understand the transaction." This finding, supported by evidence, will not be interfered with by this Court.

We have examined the other assignments of error and they are without merit. Indeed the equities of the case are all with the appellee.

Decree affirmed at cost of appellants.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIEMIENTKOSKIE v. GRABOSKIE ET UX
(Dec 16, 1936)