Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LAWRENCE R. LUTZ ET AL. v. MARGARET H. LUTZ

Testamentary Capacity — Evidence.

Testimony by testator's physician and by the draftsman of the will held to warrant a directed verdict in favor of the defendant in a caveat proceeding involving issues as to testator's knowledge of the contents of the will, his sound and disposing mind when he executed it, and whether it was procured by fraud or undue influence.

That the testator, after his execution of the will, on several occasions referred to it as dividing his estate equally between his wife and his two children, and that it perhaps failed to do this, was not sufficient basis for the submission of the case to the jury on the issue of testamentary capacity, in view of the evidence as to testator's mental competency and the independent and understanding exercise of his volition.

Decided January 20th, 1937.

URNER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Unreported cases.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LUTZ v. LUTZ
(Jan 20, 1937)