Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ISAAC MENDELSOHN, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ROSENBERG, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Per Curiam.

Although this court allowed the appeal in this cause, it has been called to our attention that the order is not appealable. ( Matter of Steinman v. Conlon, 208 N.Y. 198; Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp., 254 N.Y. 15. See Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Jewelers' Weekly Pub. Co., 155 N.Y. 241.) We, therefore, do not pass on the merits but reserve the question until properly before us for review.

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MENDELSOHN v. ROSENBERG
(Mar 23, 1937)