Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ERNEST E. GOO v. HEE FAT.

Per Curiam.

Counsel for plaintiff in error have presented a petition for rehearing in the above causes. The rehearing is sought on that portion of the opinion herein which holds that a person convicted of the crime of perjury or of subornation of perjury is barred by the statute (R.L. 1935, § 3823) from testifying in any of the courts of the Territory and that an executive pardon does not remove the disqualification.

This same subject was dealt with in the briefs of both parties and again at the oral argument and has received the fullest consideration by this court. A rehearing would avail nothing.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOO v. HEE FAT
(Apr 6, 1937)