Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BERTHA HOLDA vs. THE KING COLE STORES OF BRIDGEPORT, INC.

In this action, the plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries suffered when she slipped on a floor of the defendant's store, which allegedly was made slippery by ice, water and spinach. Evidence reviewed. Held: That as the place where the plaintiff fell was between two stands that were piled with fresh vegetables; that as the condition of the floor must have been caused by the defendant's employees or with their knowledge; that as the defendant's manager of that department where the plaintiff fell had not been absent from his post on the day in question, therefore, the defendant did have constructive notice of the unsafe condition of the floor.

JENNINGS, J.

This case concerned the fall of the plaintiff in a store operated by the defendant. The fall was claimed to have been caused by a floor made slippery by ice, water and spinach. The evidence of the parties did not meet at any point since the defendant denied all knowledge of the fall until suit was brought.

The plaintiff and her witnesses appeared credible to me and she is entitled to judgment if she can prove the necessary constructive notice of the unsafe condition of the floor. The place where the plaintiff fell was between two stands piled with fresh vegetables, including spinach. The condition of the floor must have been caused by the defendant's employees or with their knowledge. Mr. Schoolnick, manager of this department, testified that he was in immediate personal charge and had never been absent on a Saturday. The condition had existed at least half an hour before the accident.

Newell vs. K. D. Jewelry Co. 119 Conn. 332, 334 (cases cited).

The plaintiff can hardly have been injured as seriously as she claims since she did not go to a doctor for three weeks after the accident. Her excuse that she was waiting for the "Company doctor" is hardly good for that length of time. She suffered a sacroiliac strain and her occasional visits to the doctor ended in August, 1936. She had $125. in medical expense.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLDA v. THE KING COLE STORES OF BRIDGEPORT
(May 4, 1937)