Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al. v. BAJORK et al.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to enjoin a hearing before a Regional Director of the Labor Relations Board. The basis for relief stated in the petition is the invalidity of the National Labor Relations Act ( 49 Stat. 449 [ 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 151- 166]). A motion to dismiss the petition was filed. From a decree sustaining the motion and dismissing the petition, this appeal is brought.

The assignments of errors present two broad issues here: The jurisdiction of equity in a situation of this character and the validity of the act. At the time this case was submitted this court was advised that the Supreme Court would shortly consider a series of cases involving the validity of the act. In view of that situation, we deemed it wise to hold this case under submission until the Supreme Court should determine those cases as such determination might announce principles decisive of this case.

The Supreme Court has now acted. The case of National Labor Relations Board v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corporation, 57 S.Ct. 615, 81 L.Ed. ___, has determined the validity of the act. The principles announced therein are applicable to this case and are controlling.

We do not examine the issue here as to the existence of equitable jurisdiction. Even if such jurisdiction exists, the decree must be affirmed upon the issue of validity of the act.

The decree must be, and is, affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION v. BAJORK
(May 5, 1937)