Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PRIEST, APPELLANT v. CITY OF WAPAKONETA ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal corporations — Ordinances — Sections 5 and 12, Article XVIII, Constitution — Erection or extension of municipal light and power plant — Ordinance containing one subject expressed in title — Section 4226, General Code — Provision for deposit of bond proceeds — Sections 4294 and 4295, General Code — Corporate qualification of franchise grantee upon foreclosure — Section 614-73, General Code — Regulation of rates and length of franchise — Section 3983, General Code — Answer in Court of Appeals pleading a supplemental agreement — Not a material change of facts, when.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., JONES, DAY, WILLIAMS and MYERS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRIEST v. WAPAKONETA
(May 19, 1937)