Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WALLEN et al. v. CARRIKER et al.

(Syllabus.)

1. Workmen's Compensation — Compensable Injury to Deliveryman of Wholesale Establishment Received in Street Traffic.

An employee in a wholesale establishment, engaged as a deliveryman and injured in traffic, is entitled to an award for an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment under a liberal interpretation as enjoined upon the courts by statutory law.

2. Same — Law Applicable Where Employee's Work Is Integral Part of Industry Defined as Hazardous Though Work Performed in Place or Under Conditions not Inherently Hazardous.

When the work of an employee is manual or mechanical and is connected with, incident to and an integral part of business or industry enumerated in and defined as hazardous by the Workmen's Compensation Law, such employee is both protected and bound by the provisions of said act notwithstanding the fact that such work may be performed in a room or place or under conditions not inherently hazardous. Wilson Co. v. Musgrave, 180 Okla. 246, 68 P.2d 846.

RILEY, J.

The opinion in cause No. 27442, Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial Commission and J.M. Blancett, this day rendered, is hereby adopted as the opinion in this cause, 180 Okla. 446, 70 P.2d 98.

OSBORN, C. J., and WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and HURST, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, V. C. J., and GIBSON, J., dissent. BUSBY, J., absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALLEN v. CARRIKER
(Jul 13, 1937)