Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HALLICKSON, Respondent, v. CROOKS, et al, Appellants.

Appeal and Error.

A judgment by default rendered against defendant, where fact issue was presented to trial court which apparently believed plaintiff and attorneys, and disbelieved defendants, will not be disturbed on appeal as an abuse of discretion.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants assert that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside a judgment rendered against them by default. A fact issue was presented to the trial court.

After a careful review of the showing of the parties and the argument of counsel, it has become apparent to us that the trial court believed the respondent and her attorneys, and disbelieved the appellants. We are unable to say that, in so believing the showing of the respondent, the trial court abused its discretion.

The order of the trial court is affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HALLICKSON v. CROOKS
(Jul 9, 1937)