HERING v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellants, Abraham J. Isserman ( Carol King, of the New York bar). For the respondent, George W. King, Jr. Amici curiae, Aaron A. Melniker, Joel Gross, Arthur H. Bissell, Michael N. Chanalis, Arthur Garfield Hays and William G. Fennell, of the New York bar, and A.L. Wirin, of the Massachusetts bar.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JOHN HERING AND ELLA HERING, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ALMA HERING AND VIVIAN HERINGBY JOHN HERING, THEIR NEXT FRIEND, PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. STATE BOARD OFEDUCATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The wisdom of the statute under review was for the legislature; we express no view thereon. We note that the expression required of the children was a pledge, not an oath, and that, although this is not of importance, the ages of the children are slightly different from those stated in the opinion below. The judgment appealed from is affirmed and, except for these reservations, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

HERING v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

JOHN HERING AND ELLA HERING, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ALMA HERING AND VIVIAN HERINGBY JOHN HERING, THEIR NEXT FRIEND, PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. STATE BOARD OFEDUCATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Comments