Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

W. C. ERWIN v. STATE.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to Serve Notices of Appeal Jurisdictional. An appeal, when taken by the defendant, is perfected by the service of a notice upon the clerk of the court where the judgment was entered, stating that the appellant appeals from the judgment, and by the service of a similar notice upon the prosecuting attorney. These notices are the prerequisite steps to conferring upon the appellate court jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted, in the district court of Jackson county, of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at two years in the state penitentiary.

This appeal must be dismissed for the reason that no notice of appeal was served on the clerk of the court and county attorney as required by section 3193, O. S. 1931, 22 Okla. St. Ann. § 1055, which section in part reads as follows:

"An appeal is taken by the service of a notice upon the clerk of the court where the judgment was entered, stating that the appellant appeals from the judgment. If taken by the defendant, a similar notice must be served upon the prosecuting attorney."

A failure to serve a notice upon the clerk of the court and the prosecuting attorney is jurisdictional. Lutke v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 18, 255 P. 719; Austin v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 278, 28 P.2d 1113.

The appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ERWIN v. STATE
(Dec 23, 1937)