Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

BENTON HOLDEN, INCORPORATED, a corporation, complainant-appellant, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEW JERSEY et al., defendants-respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned vice-chancellor from whose decree the present appeal is taken and we also agree with two findings of law applicable thereto.

The decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BENTON HOLDEN, INC. v. CENTRAL R.R
(Jan 14, 1938)