Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALBERT HOLUB et al., complainants-respondents, v. DAVID JACOBWITZ et al.,defendants-appellants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LLOYD, J.

The bill was filed by stockholders against the corporation defendant and its president and secretary-treasurer. The appeal is from an order refusing to strike out the bill.

We agree with the conclusion reached in the court below that the allegations contained in the bill were sufficient to justify invoking the jurisdiction of the court of chancery, and that any attempt to obtain action by the officers defendants or the board of directors would have been futile.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLUB v. JACOBWITZ
(Jan 26, 1938)