Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Goldstein et al., Appellants, v. Philadelphia School District.

Negligence — Respondent superior — School district — Nuisance.

1. The habitual placing of school books on the fire escape of a public school does not constitute a nuisance. [71-2]

2. A school district is not liable for the ordinary negligence of its employees. [72]

Argued January 12, 1938.

PER CURIAM, January 31, 1938:

The minor plaintiff, 12 years of age, was injured while playing on the fire escape of one of the schools maintained by appellee. It appears the child tripped over a pile of books placed on the steps by other pupils during recess. Appellants contended that permitting the children to place books on the fire escape as a daily habit and to use it for play, constituted a nuisance which the school district negligently permitted to exist.

The court below properly concluded that the condition described by appellants' witnesses did not constitute a nuisance. At most, the agents and servants of the school district were negligent in permitting the pupils to do the things related, and it is well settled that a school district is not liable for the ordinary negligence of its employees: Carlo v. Scranton School District, 319 Pa. 417.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOLDSTEIN ET AL. v. PHILA. SCHOOL DIST
(Jan 31, 1938)