Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HUDSON et al. v. GILBERT, Rec.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Insufficiency of Transcript for Review of Alleged Errors.

Where a transcript on appeal fails to show affirmatively that it contains a true, full, and complete copy of all of the proceedings on the trial which are properly a part of the record, this court will not review the alleged errors.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error filed their transcript of a proceeding on November 30, 1937, and attached thereto is a certificate of the court clerk naming certain instruments included in the transcript and certifying that they are each full, true and exact copies of the originals of such instruments as the same appear on file and of record in the office of the court clerk of McCurtain county in cause No. 9584, entitled John I. Gilbert, as receiver for Gum Brothers Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. M. F. Hudson et al., Defendants.

We are of the opinion that such certificate is insufficient, and hold that the cause must be dismissed under the following authorities: Schabel v. Wright, 179 Okla. 73, 64 P.2d 855; Render v. Dodson, 179 Okla. 352, 66 P.2d 14; Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; McGuire v. Rash, 89 Okla. 132, 214 P. 698; Thomas v. Potter, 164 Okla. 212, 23 P.2d 381.

The appeal is dismissed.

BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, PHELPS, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUDSON v. GILBERT
(Feb 1, 1938)