Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Max DIAMOND v. UNITED STATES. Louis ROTHKOPF

PER CURIAM.

It appearing upon the record in these appeals that evidence procured by wire tapping constituted a vital factor in the conviction of appellants, and that such testimony is forbidden by section 605 of the Federal Communication Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.A. § 605 (see Frank Carmine Nardone et al. v. United States of America, 58 S.Ct. 275, 82 L.Ed. ___, decided by the Supreme Court December 20, 1937), it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgments appealed from be, and the same are, reversed and the cases are remanded to the District Court for new trials.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIAMOND v. UNITED STATES
(Feb 17, 1938)