Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MORRISS-BUICK COMPANY v. H. H. Huss.

Measure of Damages — Charge of Court — Fraud.

See syllabi in Morriss-Buick Company v. Pondrom, supra, p. 98.

MR. JUDGE MARTIN delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

This is a companion case to that of Morriss-Buick Co. v. Pondrom, this day decided ( supra, p. 98). The law questions, with one exception, are identical in the two cases.

Judgments of the trial court and Court of Civil Appeals are reversed and cause remanded.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court February 23, 1938.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MORRISS-BUICK CO. v. HUSS
(Feb 23, 1938)