Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

E.G. TILLOTSON CO., INC., APPELLEE v. WARD, APPELLANT.

Corporations — Right to sue after corporate charter cancelled.

A corporation may maintain an action to collect a note due it, notwithstanding the cancellation of its corporate charter by the Secretary of State less than two years prior to the commencement of the action.

BY THE COURT.

The lower court held the plaintiff corporation could maintain this action to collect a note due the company, notwithstanding its corporate charter had been cancelled by the Secretary of State less than two years prior to the commencement of the action.

The judgment is affirmed on authority of Eversman v. Ray Shipman Co., 115 Ohio St. 269, 152 N.E. 643, and Sweeny, Recr., v. Keystone Driller Co., 122 Ohio St. 16, 170 N.E. 436, and Section 8623-80, General Code, and related sections.

Judgment affirmed.

ROSS, P.J., HAMILTON and MATTHEWS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

E.G. TILLOTSON CO. v. WARD
(Mar 28, 1938)