Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND UNIVERSAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,APPELLANTS, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.,RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, DONGES, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 8.

For affirmance as to first and third counts only — CASE, HETFIELD, WALKER, JJ. 3.

For reversal as to first and third counts — None.

For reversal as to second and fourth counts only — CASE, HETFIELD, WALKER, JJ. 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNIVERSAL INS. CO. v. STATE BOARD TAX APPEALS
(Apr 29, 1938)