Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Gliwa, Appellant, v. United States Steel Corporation et al. (No. 2).

Equity — Pleading — Issues — Assumpsit and trespass admixture.

An order sustaining preliminary objections to a bill in equity was affirmed on appeal, where it appeared, as stated in the opinion of the court below, that the issues in the case had not been crystallized into precise legal averments so that the court might control and guide the litigation, and there was a serious admixture of assumpsit and trespass action in the bill of complaint.

Argued March 30, 1938.

PER CURIAM, May 9, 1938:

The order of the court below is affirmed on the following excerpt from Judge MUSMANNO'S opinion which analyzes the issues contained in the bill of complaint:

". . . until those issues are crystallized into precise legal averments so that the Court may control and guide the litigation in the channels of law and justice, there can be no trial.

"We might suggest also that there is a serious admixture of assumpsit and trespass action in the bill of complaint, to which attention should be directed in the preparation and filing of any amended bill."

Appellants are allowed thirty days in which to file an amended bill of complaint.

Order affirmed at appellants' cost.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GLIWA v. U.S. STEEL CORP. ET AL. (NO. 2)
(May 9, 1938)