Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

W. C. SWALLEY v. JEFFERSON COUNTY and Automatic Voting Machine Corporation.

THOMAS, Justice.

The matters presented by this appeal were fully considered and decided by the opinion of the Chief Justice and by the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Bouldin in the original decision, and on application for rehearing, in the case of D. T. McCall et al. v. Automatic Voting Machine Corp., ante, p. 10, 180 So. 695.

The decision, therefore, in said case is decisive of the questions presented by this appeal, and a further discussion at this time of the matters involved herein would serve no useful purpose.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and a judgment here entered granting injunctive relief prayed for by appellant.

Reversed and rendered.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

GARDNER, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SWALLEY v. JEFFERSON COUNTY
(Jun 16, 1938)