Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOLCOMB et al. v. COPELAND et al.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error having filed no briefs upon this writ of error, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

Dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLCOMB v. COPELAND
(Jun 16, 1938)