Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Willoughby v. Bacon et al., Appellants.

Schools — Teachers — Contracts — Employment under existing contract on effective date of Act of April 6, 1937, P. L. 213.

1. Where a teacher was notified that his contract would not be renewed at the end of the school year, because his position was to be eliminated for purposes of economy, but no formal action was taken by the board until after the effective date of the Act of April 6, 1937, P. L. 213, and at such time the teacher was still employed by the board and was performing his duties under his existing contract, he was entitled to a new contract for the following year. [438-9]

2. Teachers' Tenure Act Cases, 329 Pa. 213, held controlling. [439]

Argued May 24, 1938.

PER CURIAM, June 17, 1938:

Appellee was employed, under a written contract, by the Harrisburg School District as a teacher of industrial arts, and was so engaged during the school year 1936-1937. In October, 1936, the district superintendent recommended to the Board the elimination of one of the four industrial arts positions of the district, for purposes of economy. The Board, sitting as a committee of the whole, approved this recommendation. Appellee was notified verbally in December, 1936, and by letter from the superintendent on January 28, 1937, that as a result of this action his contract would not be renewed at the end of the school year, June 16, 1937. No formal action was taken by the Board until April 28, 1937, when appellee was officially notified that his position would be "closed" on June 16, 1937. After the adoption of the Teachers' Tenure Act of April 6, 1937, P. L. 213, appellee demanded a contract for the school year 1937-1938 under its provisions, and upon the refusal of the Board to tender it, instituted mandamus proceedings. The court below granted the writ, and this appeal was taken by the Board.

Appellee was still employed by the Board and was performing his duties under his existing contract at the time the Tenure Act took effect. The decision of this Court in the Teachers' Tenure Act Cases, 329 Pa. 213, disposes of this appeal.

Decree affirmed at appellants' cost.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLOUGHBY v. BACON
(Jun 17, 1938)